It just occurred to me that at some point, a male who is not an infant has been circumsized. And that male (those males) had had sex beforehand. How else could they know that sex isn't as good afterwards as it was beforehand.
That sucks.
I wonder why they would have decided to get circumsized?
My husband was circumcised as a newborn. I told him that if we ever have a son, I don't want to circumcise him. He feels that our son should be so that he'll be the same as his dad. I've told my husband that the uncircumcised penis works better with the vagina. I'm totally linking to a website...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/why/female_carinal_hook.html
You'd really have to read it all. There are multiple pages on this website that will show you how it SHOULD work if the penis was uncircumcised. Yes, it's pretty graphic, but it really helped me to understand why the penis should be left alone.
Yeah, I think it's bullshit that we do that to our kids for no good reason- I say that, and I circumsized all the kids. If I had them TODAY I would leave their stuff alone. thankfully they never had sex before getting it done. hehehe. I think it would be okay to not circumsize them even if daddy is snipped. I wonder if we make a bigger deal out of the "difference" than is necessary, you know? I didn't feel strongly about having them circumsized when they were born or anything, but I'm getting a stronger opinion now (who ME, opinionated?! You're KIDDING! hehe)about how stupid it is to do something like that. Girls have a good chance of getting bladder infections and we don't surgically alter them (in this country, thank GOD)...you know? Silly! Thanks for the link, R!!!!! :)
ReplyDelete